短视频平台上活跃着大量不持律师执业证书的"法务总监""法律顾问"，他们通过精致人设包装和虚假承诺，对寻求法律帮助的消费者层层收割1。这些机构以"不成功不收费"作为诱饵吸引受害者，但实际收费远高于正规律所，甚至在合同中埋入不合理仲裁条款1。调查显示，一起3.8万元欠款纠纷中，受害人被收取5000元"立案服务费"，单项收费已超过正规律所全程代理费用1。更极端的案例是，受害人小源的母亲前后交了7.7万元费用，却从头到尾未见过真律师1。
这一灰产已形成零门槛入行、高利润分成的流水线模式1。平台招募员工的成本极低，仅需0投入、0门槛就能加入，客户线索每条仅需5至10元即可购得，分成模式从普通五五分账到七成高额分成不等1。员工入职第一天就被要求换上AI生成的正装职业照，对外则统一虚假称呼为"王主任""李法顾"等1。维权的代价也被刻意抬高——合同中的仲裁条款使维权成本达到1.7万元，已经超过了被坑金额本身1。
为遏制这一乱象，司法部、公安部、国家市场监督管理总局于2025年9月至12月开展专项行动规范法律咨询服务机构1。短视频平台也推出了监管措施：抖音于2025年11月底禁止未认证主体发布招揽内容，禁用"法务总监"等误导性称谓1；微信视频号自2026年3月起要求法律类直播主播公示真实姓名、律师执业证号和所属律所1。
Investigations have uncovered a widespread fraud scheme operating across short video platforms, where unqualified individuals posing as "legal directors" and "legal consultants" exploit vulnerable consumers seeking legal assistance 1. These fraudsters use polished personal branding, false promises, and deceptive fee structures to extract money from victims. In one documented case, a victim was charged 5,000 yuan in "case filing fees" for a debt dispute worth only 38,000 yuan—a sum exceeding the full legal representation cost at legitimate law firms 1. Another victim's mother paid a total of 77,000 yuan without ever meeting an actual licensed attorney 1.
The operation functions as a streamlined profit machine with near-zero barriers to entry. Operators claim the venture requires "zero investment and zero threshold to join," purchasing customer leads for just 5 to 10 yuan each and distributing profits through either equal splits or arrangements favoring the company at 70 percent 1. New employees receive AI-generated professional headshots on their first day and are assigned false titles such as "Director Wang" or "Legal Adviser Li" when interacting with clients 1. Critically, these fraudulent contracts often contain hidden arbitration clauses that make disputing them extraordinarily expensive—one victim faced arbitration costs of 17,000 yuan, exceeding the amount they were defrauded of in the first place 1.
In response, the Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Public Security, and State Administration for Market Regulation launched a specialized enforcement action from September to December 2025 to regulate legal consultation service providers 1. Douyin (TikTok's Chinese platform) banned unverified accounts from posting recruitment content and prohibited misleading titles such as "legal director" starting in November 2025 1. WeChat Video required legal livestream broadcasters to publicly disclose their real names, lawyer license numbers, and affiliated law firms beginning in March 2026 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。