长沙宁乡市人民法院近日宣判一起不当得利纠纷案1。用户李某向上海某科技公司充值1000元推广服务费，但该公司工作人员因操作失误将他人账号ID号作为充值金额，错误地向李某账户充值26419933元1。
李某随后使用这笔错误充值在平台进行消费约25万元1。公司发现错误后冻结账户并要求返还，李某拒不理睬1。法院判决李某向该公司支付不当得利款252281.31元1，这是李某实际使用金额扣除原充值1000元后的数额1。公司同时冻结并扣回剩余款项26419***4096元，并扣回未完成服务费9400余元1。
The Ningxiang City People's Court in Changsha, Hunan province recently ruled on a case of unjust enrichment involving a critical system malfunction.1 A user identified as Li deposited 1,000 yuan for promotional services with a Shanghai technology company on September 27, 2025, but a staff member's operational error resulted in the user's account ID number being processed as a recharge amount, crediting Li's account with an additional 26,419,933 yuan.1 Li subsequently spent approximately 250,000 yuan from this mistaken balance on platform transactions before the company discovered the error on October 17, 2025, froze the account, and demanded repayment.1
When Li refused to return the funds, the company pursued legal action.1 The court determined that Li had received an unjust benefit without legal justification and ordered him to repay 252,281.31 yuan—the actual amount he had consumed, excluding his original 1,000 yuan deposit.1 The company simultaneously recovered the remaining balance and deducted approximately 9,400 yuan in uncompleted service fees from the erroneous credit.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。