智能眼镜市场正在快速扩张。2025年中国智能眼镜市场出货量达246万台，同比增长87.1%，预计2026年将进一步攀升至491.5万台，同比增长77.7%[1]。商务部数据显示，上半年重点平台智能眼镜销售额增长了1.5倍[1]。这一增长趋势的背后，是消费者对其便捷拍照录像功能的追捧，但也伴随着日益严峻的滥用风险。
然而，产品设计中的缺陷正被不法分子利用。电商平台销售的遮光贴可以绕开拍摄指示灯，其中一款产品销量高达6000件，销售页面明确标注"拍摄无光、不触发警报"[1]。这类规避手段使得隐私侵犯变得更加隐蔽。法学院讲师卢煜彤指出，"即便在公共场所，利用智能眼镜偷拍他人肖像、私密活动，也构成对肖像权、隐私权的侵犯"[1]。
隐私风险还延伸至数据层面。声纹、视线轨迹等属于敏感个人信息，按规定处理时需要取得个人单独同意，但许多厂商目前普遍采用"一揽子授权协议"的做法[1]。为应对这些挑战，工信部在2026年6月指导发布了《AI眼镜可信视界自律公约》，由雷鸟、华为、中兴等10家企业签署[1]，开始建立行业自律机制。与此同时，监管部门也明确了法律底线——教育部2026年高考预警信息明确提醒，考生携带智能眼镜进入考场即构成作弊[1]。
The rapid expansion of smart glasses equipped with photo and video capabilities has created significant privacy risks alongside market growth. China's smart glasses market shipped 2.46 million units in 2025, representing an 87.1% year-over-year increase, with projections reaching 4.915 million units by 2026, a 77.7% rise [1]. Commerce Ministry data indicates that sales on major e-commerce platforms surged 1.5 times during the first half of the year [1].
The misuse potential of these devices has become increasingly apparent. Light-blocking stickers sold on e-commerce platforms can circumvent camera indicator lights, with one product recording over 6,000 sales and labeled as enabling "photography without light, no alert activation" [1]. According to law lecturer Lu Yutong, unauthorized recording of others' images or private activities through smart glasses violates portrait rights and privacy rights even in public spaces [1]. Sensitive personal data including voiceprints and eye-tracking patterns require individual consent for processing, yet manufacturers typically employ "blanket authorization agreements" [1].
Regulatory efforts are underway to address these concerns. In June 2026, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released the "AI Glasses Trustworthy Vision Industry Self-Regulation Covenant," which was signed by ten enterprises including Rabird, Huawei, and ZTE [1]. The Ministry of Education issued a 2026 college entrance examination alert explicitly warning that candidates carrying smart glasses into examination venues would constitute cheating [1].