国家互联网信息办公室就《中华人民共和国反网络暴力法（征求意见稿）》公开向社会征求意见，该意见征求自7月29日开始，于8月28日结束为期一个月的工作1。普通网民、受害者、律师及法学研究者从各自经历与实务出发，围绕取证难、维权成本高、平台治理边界、自诉转公诉、人格权侵害禁令及网络暴力告诫书等提出具体修改建议1。其中，北京千千律师事务所列出25条建议，经内部研讨后最终保留10条1。讨论同时聚焦如何在治理网络暴力与保障言论自由、舆论监督之间划定清晰边界1。
在维权实践中，小叶于2025年8月收到判决：一名被告被判赔礼道歉并赔偿精神损害金及公证费、案件受理费共计2750元；另一名被告被判赔礼道歉并赔偿500元1。姜圆于7月13日前往派出所报案，7月20日派出所向其出具立案告知书1。针对取证问题，征求意见稿提出：“人民法院经审查认为受害人提供证据确有困难的，应当依法要求公安机关提供协助，公安机关应当予以配合。”1 此外，征求意见稿在附则中提到：“依法通过网络检举、揭发违法犯罪以及实施舆论监督的，不适用相关规定。”1
The Cyberspace Administration of China concluded the one-month public consultation period for the Draft Anti-Cyber Violence Law of the People's Republic of China on August 28, following its initial release for public feedback on July 29 1. During this period, ordinary internet users, victims, lawyers, and legal researchers submitted specific revision proposals based on their own experiences and practical work, focusing on difficulties in evidence collection, high rights protection costs, the boundaries of platform governance, the transition from private to public prosecution, injunctions against personality right infringements, and cyber violence admonition letters 1. The discussions also centered on how to draw a clear boundary between governing cyber violence and protecting freedom of speech and public opinion supervision 1.
The Beijing Qianqian Law Firm initially listed 25 suggestions, which were narrowed down to 10 after internal deliberation 1. Jiang Yuan reported a case to a local police station on July 13 and received a formal case filing notice from the police station on July 20 1. Xiao Ye received a court verdict in August 2025, where one defendant was ordered to apologize and pay a total of 2,750 yuan for mental distress, notarization, and court fees, while another defendant was ordered to apologize and pay 500 yuan 1.
To address the issue of evidence collection, the draft law stipulates that if a people's court determines upon review that a victim indeed faces difficulties in providing evidence, it shall request assistance from the public security organ according to law, and the organ shall cooperate 1. Furthermore, the supplementary provisions of the draft clarify that reporting and exposing illegal and criminal activities through the internet, as well as conducting public opinion supervision in accordance with the law, are not subject to the relevant provisions of this regulation 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。