河南开封一起网络直播售假案近日宣判，涉案人员张某某、郑某某因销售假冒翡翠并部分拒不发货被法院定罪。[1]案件发生于2024年7月至8月间，张某某等人冒充纯天然翡翠销售经过处理的低档玉石，涉及销售总金额达167180元，其中收款不发货金额达12997元，张某某个人非法获利2.2万元。[1]
检察机关认定该案同时构成销售伪劣产品罪和诈骗罪两项罪名。[1]龙亭区检察院第一检察部负责人赵云云指出，"以次充好"的销售伪劣产品行为与"非法占有"的诈骗行为，二者在主观故意、行为模式及侵害法益上均有本质区别。[1]法院最终判处张某某有期徒刑一年零六个月，并处罚金4万元；判处郑某某有期徒刑一年零六个月，并处罚金5万元。[1]
A case from Kaifeng, Henan province illustrates the legal complexities surrounding livestreamed product sales. In July and August 2024, Zhang and Zheng engaged in online broadcasting to sell processed low-grade jade stones while misrepresenting them as pure natural jade [1]. The total sales amount involved reached 167,180 yuan, with 12,997 yuan collected but not delivered to customers [1]. Zhang individually profited illegally by 22,000 yuan from the scheme [1].
Prosecutors identified the conduct as encompassing two distinct criminal offenses: sales of substandard products and fraud [1]. The court ultimately sentenced both defendants to one and a half years imprisonment, imposing fines of 40,000 yuan on Zhang and 50,000 yuan on Zheng [1]. According to Zhao Yunyun, head of the First Prosecutorial Division at the Longtinq District People's Procuratorate, the distinction between these offenses is fundamental: "The misrepresentation involved in selling substandard goods and the illegal appropriation inherent in fraud differ in subjective intent, behavioral patterns, and the legal interests they violate" [1].