澳大利亚联邦制下的“竞争性联邦主义”正面临运作困境,联邦政府与各州和领地政府之间在多项重大政策上存在紧张关系 1。这种紧张局势的根源在于财政权力高度集中于联邦,各州自身筹集的收入仅占其支出所需的大约一半,导致垂直财政失衡,削弱了各州的政策自主性和竞争力 1。
在政策协调层面,联邦政府与各州和领地政府在国家内阁会议上协商GST分配、国家残疾保险计划改革、数据中心监管和全国枪支回购等重大政策 1。在GST分配方面,2018年的特别协议使西澳州在GST分配中获得远超其所需的份额 1。澳大利亚联邦研究中心对3000多名澳大利亚人的调查显示,40%的受访者不认为其所在州获得了公平的联邦政府支出份额 1。尽管如此,约55%的澳大利亚人支持现行GST安排,且仅有29%的澳大利亚人同意西澳州获得了比其应得更多的GST 1。
The Australian federal system faces operational difficulties as the federal government and state and territory governments negotiate major policies at National Cabinet meetings, including Goods and Services Tax (GST) distribution, National Disability Insurance Scheme reforms, data center regulation, and a national gun buyback program 1. This situation involves a vertical fiscal imbalance, as the states can raise only about half of the revenue they need for their expenditures due to the high concentration of financial power at the federal level 1. This undermines the policy autonomy and competitiveness of the states 1.
A 2018 special agreement allowed Western Australia to secure a share of the GST far exceeding its actual requirements 1. A survey of over 3,000 Australians conducted by the Australian Federation Research Centre found that approximately 55% of respondents support the current GST arrangement 1. Additionally, only 29% of Australians agree that Western Australia receives more GST than it deserves 1. However, 40% of the respondents do not believe that their own state receives a fair share of federal government spending 1.
评论
还没有评论,欢迎留下第一条。