湖南祁东一老人在棋牌店门口突发疾病离世，家属向店主索赔，经当地综治中心调解，店主一方支付19000元“人道主义补偿” 1。事件引发舆论对基层调解“和稀泥”的质疑 1。经公安机关调查核实，罗某系突发疾病死亡，无外力伤害、无争执冲突，排除刑事案件 1。2026年8月26日下午，死者家属将19000元转回店主肖爱华儿子账户 1。26日晚，双方在当地有关部门见证下签署新的《见证书》 1。
在18日第一次调解中，罗某家属提出10万元诉求，肖爱华自愿人道帮扶2000元，家属降至5万元后不再让步，调解暂停 1。19日第二次调解中，家属降至2万元，店主亲属提出15000元，最终达成19000元共识 1。死者妻子在笔录中否认亲属有过“停尸闹事”言行 1。店主一方在笔录中称对方前期有过“不赔偿就把尸体放门口”的表达，但承认未真正实施 1。罗某儿子表示：“没有过错，是不需要赔偿的，我们如今认可这一点” 1。家属承认接受补偿不妥 1。
An elderly man surnamed Luo suddenly died of an illness outside a card and chess shop in Qidong County, Hunan Province, prompting his family to seek compensation from the shop owner 1. Following public scrutiny over the grassroots mediation practice of "compromising without principle," the deceased's family refunded the 19,000 yuan "humanitarian compensation" to the account of the shop owner Xiao Aihua's son on the afternoon of August 26, 2026 1. Later that evening, both parties signed a new Witness Certificate under the supervision of relevant local departments, with the family admitting that accepting the compensation was inappropriate 1. Police investigations confirmed that Luo died of a sudden illness without any injuries caused by external forces or any disputes or conflicts, officially ruling out a criminal case 1.
The compensation dispute went through two rounds of mediation before the final agreement 1. During the first session on August 18, 2026, Luo's family demanded 100,000 yuan, while Xiao Aihua voluntarily offered 2,000 yuan for humanitarian assistance, leading to a suspension of mediation after the family refused to lower their demand below 50,000 yuan 1. In the second session on August 19, 2026, the family reduced their demand to 20,000 yuan, and the shop owner's relatives proposed 15,000 yuan, eventually reaching a consensus of 19,000 yuan 1. Regarding the circumstances surrounding the mediation, the deceased's wife denied in her written statement that relatives had engaged in the behavior of "causing a disturbance with the corpse," although the shop owner's side stated in their written statement that the family had previously expressed the intention of "leaving the corpse at the door if no compensation was paid," but admitted this was never actually carried out 1. Reflecting on the final outcome, Luo's son stated, "If there is no fault, there is no need for compensation, and we now recognize this" 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。