北京大学国家发展研究院副院长张丹丹在财经访谈节目中称"灵活本身就是一种福利"，并表示灵活就业者因不用朝九晚五而获得了自由，这一表述随即引发网络舆论批评1。中共官媒环球时报前总编辑胡锡进随后发文表示，这种表述"完全不可接受"，认为大多数灵活就业者是被迫选择而非自愿追求自由1。
法律网红张三同学通过微博反驳了这一观点，指出外卖、快递、网约车等行业工作者每天工作12小时属于常态，月休仅2至3天1。根据数据预测，2025年中国灵活就业人数预计达到3.2亿，占就业人数的40%以上1。在上海，灵活就业者最低档社保费用中，养老保险需1492元/月，医疗保险需746元/月，合计月支出2238元1。
A Peking University professor's comments characterizing flexible employment as a form of welfare have ignited widespread criticism online, with prominent figures including a former state media editor rejecting the characterization as fundamentally misguided.1
Zhang Dandan, associate dean of Peking University's National School of Development, made the remarks during a financial talk show, stating that "flexibility itself is a form of welfare" and contrasting flexible workers' freedom with the loss of autonomy experienced by traditional nine-to-five employees who "sacrificed freedom in exchange for social insurance."1 The comments drew sharp rebukes from observers including Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, who declared Zhang's formulation "completely unacceptable" and argued it was "entirely at odds with public concerns and values."1 Legal commentator Zhang San echoed this criticism on social media, pointing out that delivery, courier, and ride-hailing workers typically work 12-hour days as standard practice with only 2 to 3 days off per month.1
The dispute underscores growing tensions around flexible employment in China, where the workforce segment is expanding rapidly. By 2025, flexible employment is projected to account for over 40 percent of China's workforce, representing approximately 3.2 billion workers.1 The financial burden on these workers remains substantial, with Shanghai-based flexible workers facing monthly social insurance costs of 1,492 yuan for pension coverage and 746 yuan for medical insurance, totaling 2,238 yuan monthly.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。