巴尔的摩金莺队与纽约洋基队的比赛中，金莺队球员Pete Alonso的一次深远打击被裁判判罚为界外球1。经过录像回放，判罚维持不变，但这一决定备受争议——一个摄像角度显示球在界线右侧，另一个角度则显示在左侧1。最终巴尔的摩金莺队以5:3负于洋基队1。
这一判罚引发了关于棒球是否需要更多先进技术手段的讨论1。赛后，Alonso就这一判罚表达了看法。他表示："我认为可以安装朝正上方发射的摄像头或激光，我们已拥有所有的技术、数据分析和相关资金，我不明白为什么做不到"1。
不过，在这样的远距离情景下，Hawk-Eye数据的准确性存在局限1。由于风等环境因素未被完全考虑，该系统在球场这么远的地方难以提供完全可靠的判断1。与此同时，美职棒大联盟(MLB)今年已推出ABS系统，并在小联盟试验允许对check swing判罚提出异议的技术1。
A controversial foul ball ruling during a game between the Baltimore Orioles and New York Yankees has reignited discussions about whether baseball requires more advanced technology to resolve disputed boundary calls.1 The Orioles lost the matchup 5-3 to the Yankees.1
Pete Alonso of the Orioles hit a deep fly ball that umpires ruled foul, a judgment that was upheld upon video review.1 The decision proved contentious, with one camera angle suggesting the ball landed on the fair side of the foul line while another angle indicated it was on the foul side.1 Following the game, Alonso advocated for additional technological intervention: "I think having a camera or laser shooting straight up, we have all the technology, analytics and whatever and funds. I don't see why we can't do it."1
However, technical limitations present obstacles to such solutions.1 Hawk-Eye data becomes unreliable at distances typical of baseball stadiums because factors such as wind are not fully accounted for in the calculations.1 Meanwhile, Major League Baseball has introduced the ABS system this year and is testing technology in the minor leagues that would permit players to challenge check swing rulings.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。