上汽大众于7月28日发布微博，针对小米昆仑增程器的宣传进行了对标回应，重点展示其ID.ERA 9X车型搭载的EA211黄金增程器的性能优势[1]。
在油品兼容性方面，两款产品表现相当[1]。小米昆仑增程器全系支持92号、95号及98号汽油[1]，上汽大众EA211增程器同样支持92号、95号及98号汽油[1]。但在质保政策上存在差异，小米提供增程器及三电系统8年或16万公里超长质保[1]，而上汽大众则在此基础上还将提供整车终身质保[1]。
在燃油经济性和续航能力方面，小米澎程系列最低油耗可达5.7L/100km[1]，优于上汽大众ID.ERA 9X的6.27L/100km[1]。在纯电续航方面，小米澎程系列全系最大电池容量76kWh，CLTC纯电续航505km[1]，而大众ID.ERA 9X电池容量65.2kWh，CLTC纯电续航406公里[1]。上汽大众ID.ERA 9X于4月25日上市[1]，小米澎程技术发布会定于7月30日晚7点举行[1]。
On July 28, SAIC Volkswagen released a social media post comparing its EA211 golden extended-range engine, featured in the ID.ERA 9X model, against Xiaomi's Kunlun extended-range unit in response to Xiaomi's marketing campaign [1]. The two powertrains were detailed side-by-side across fuel compatibility, warranty coverage, fuel consumption, and driving range metrics.
Both systems demonstrate identical multi-fuel capability, supporting 92, 95, and 98 octane gasoline [1]. However, their warranty policies diverge: Xiaomi's Kunlun extended-range unit and battery systems carry an eight-year or 160,000-kilometer coverage, while SAIC Volkswagen extends this advantage by adding lifetime vehicle warranty [1]. In efficiency terms, Xiaomi's Phaeton series achieves a minimum fuel consumption of 5.7 liters per 100 kilometers, whereas the ID.ERA 9X registers 6.27 liters per 100 kilometers [1].
Battery capacity and electric-only range also favor the Xiaomi offering: the Phaeton series' maximum battery reaches 76 kilowatt-hours with a 505-kilometer CLTC pure electric driving range, compared to the ID.ERA 9X's 65.2 kilowatt-hour battery and 406-kilometer CLTC range [1]. The ID.ERA 9X launched on April 25 [1], while Xiaomi's Phaeton technical presentation is scheduled for July 30 at 7 p.m. [1].
