河南焦作市马村区人民法院审结一起网购玩具纠纷案，对"进货式网购"的法律性质进行了明确界定。1居民范某批量采购玩具用于摆摊转售，支付定金200元、货款488元，尾款700元由卖方代收，订购商品总价值1388元。1范某声称收到的商品货不对板，仅有99个电动飞行玩具符合订购要求，其余近千件为塑料玩具和竹制品，因此要求卖方支付三倍赔偿。1
法院经审理认定，范某的采购行为属于经营性进货而非个人生活消费，不适用消费者权益保护法的惩罚性赔偿规则。1根据消费者权益保护法第二条，该法保护的是"为生活消费需要购买、使用商品或者接受服务"的自然人。1由于范某批量采购商品用于摆摊转售，其身份应认定为经营者而非消费者。1最终，法院驳回了范某的三倍赔偿诉求，仅支持其退回已支付的688元货款。1
A court in Henan province has ruled on whether bulk purchasers qualify for consumer protection remedies. The Ma Cun District People's Court in Zhaozuo City resolved a toy purchase dispute involving resident Fan, who bought items in large quantities for resale at a street stall 1. Fan claimed the goods were not as described and sought triple damages under consumer protection law 1.
Fan paid 200 yuan as a deposit and subsequently 488 yuan in additional payment, with a remaining 700 yuan to be collected on delivery 1. The original order was valued at 1,388 yuan, but Fan alleged receiving only 99 electric flying toys while the rest consisted of plastic toys and bamboo products totaling nearly 1,000 items 1. The court determined that Fan's bulk acquisition for resale purposes constituted commercial purchasing rather than personal consumption 1. According to the Consumer Protection Law, the statute protects natural persons who purchase goods or receive services "for the purpose of living consumption" 1. Because Fan's purchase was for business operations, the court found her ineligible for punitive damages provisions 1.
The judgment upheld Fan's claim for the return of 688 yuan already paid but rejected the request for triple compensation 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。