10月14日，78岁的宾夕法尼亚大学传播学退休教授Carolyn Marvin在美国费城因阻挡自动驾驶配送机器人而被捕 1。警方指控其犯有扰乱秩序罪，并在报告中指出该行为涉及对配送机器人的“破坏性刑事恶意行为” 1。Marvin表示，她此举旨在象征性地抗议技术侵占公共空间、取代低薪劳工以及带来的隐私风险，并坚持认为机器人应当让位于行人 1。
这一事件发生在Uber Eats于当年3月在费城推出自动配送机器人车队之后，该城市成为这项服务的第四个试点地 1。尽管Marvin声称拥有第一修正案赋予的在公共空间抗议企业滥用的权利，且认为她的行动最多只会导致午餐延误15分钟，但她面临的法律处境却颇具争议 1。根据2020年宾夕法尼亚州的一项立法，自主配送机器人被定义为“个人配送设备”，在法律上归类为行人而非车辆 1。当时，共和党人支持该法案作为技术进步的象征，而民主党人、工会及无障碍倡导者则担忧其会导致就业流失和安全问题 1。
出狱后，Marvin态度坚决，表示将继续实施阻挡机器人的行动，但承诺会更加注意警察的动向 1。
Carolyn Marvin, a 78-year-old retired communication professor from the University of Pennsylvania, was arrested on October 14 in Philadelphia for blocking an autonomous delivery robot 1. She faces charges of disorderly conduct, with police reports citing criminal mischief related to the disruption of the robot's operations 1. Despite her detention, Marvin stated that she intends to continue blocking robots after her release, though she plans to pay closer attention to police movements 1.
Marvin described her actions as a symbolic protest against the encroachment of technology into public spaces, the displacement of low-wage laborers, and associated privacy risks 1. She asserted her First Amendment right to protest corporate abuses in public areas and argued that robots should yield to pedestrians 1. According to Marvin, the maximum delay caused by her interference amounted to only 15 minutes for lunch deliveries 1.
The arrest highlights the legal framework established in Pennsylvania in 2020, which classifies autonomous delivery robots as "personal delivery devices" legally treated as pedestrians rather than vehicles 1. This legislation sparked controversy prior to its enactment, with Democrats, unions, and accessibility advocates opposing it due to concerns about job losses and safety, while Republicans supported it as a step toward technological progress 1. Contextually, Uber Eats had introduced a fleet of these delivery robots in Philadelphia in March, making it the fourth city to host the service 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。