随着老年网民群体不断扩大，针对老年人的网络侵权手段正从传统形式向利用新技术演变。截至2025年12月，中国60岁及以上老年网民用户规模已达1.73亿人，占网民整体的15.4% 1。在此背景下，北京互联网法院近期通报了涉老年人网络侵权案件的审理情况并发布典型案例，指出恶意剪辑、AI换脸及非法使用声音等新型侵权风险日益凸显 1。数据显示，该院累计受理涉及60岁以上老年人的网络侵权纠纷达4671件，其中名誉权侵权案件占比超过70% 1。
在具体案例中，李某乙因恶意截取电视节目视频并配以虚假字幕，导致相关内容浏览量达到150万次、评论量达1万，最终被判令公开赔礼道歉并赔偿精神损害抚慰金 1。针对技术滥用问题，法院在判决中明确，若商家未经许可合成老年人声音用于商业宣传，且该声音结合音色、语调、发音节奏及社会知名度能够识别特定老年人，则构成对其人格权益的侵害 1。此外，委托方若未尽到审查注意义务，须承担连带责任；而未经许可使用老年逝者的肖像照片进行商业宣传，同样构成对肖像权益的侵权 1。法院提醒老年人应注意固定证据以维护自身合法权益 1。
The Beijing Internet Court has issued a warning regarding new risks of online infringement targeting the elderly, citing cases involving malicious editing, AI face-swapping, and illegal use of voices 1. As the population of senior internet users expands, the court highlighted that these sophisticated forms of digital exploitation are becoming increasingly prominent 1. The court released typical case examples alongside data on recent litigation trends to illustrate how technological tools are being misused to harm older adults 1.
Data indicates that as of December 2025, there were 173 million internet users aged 60 and above in China, accounting for 15.4% of the total netizen population 1. Reflecting this demographic shift, the Beijing Internet Court has accepted a cumulative total of 4,671 network infringement disputes involving seniors over the age of 60 1. Among these cases, those concerning the right to reputation constitute more than 70% of the docket 1.
In one specific example, an individual identified as Li Yi was found guilty of maliciously clipping television program videos and adding false subtitles, which resulted in 1.5 million views and 10,000 comments 1. The court ordered Li to make a public apology and pay compensation for mental distress 1. Legal rulings from the court have clarified that synthesizing an elderly person’s voice for commercial promotion without permission constitutes an infringement of personality rights if the voice can be identified through timbre, tone, rhythm, and social recognition 1. Furthermore, merchants who fail to fulfill their duty of review may bear joint liability, while using the portraits of deceased seniors for commercial purposes also violates portrait rights 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。