美国教育部长琳达·麦克马洪计划投入约43,278.64美元为新办公室购置家具，官方解释称现有设备磨损严重且无法与新办公空间在配置或审美上融合 1。随着教育部将从林登·B·约翰逊大楼迁至华盛顿特区市中心的一座较小建筑，此举引发了关于公共资金使用的讨论 1。尽管特朗普政府此前声称通过削减教育开支和搬迁办公地点每年为纳税人节省数百万美元，但这一近4.3万美元的支出计划仍显得引人注目 1。
此次家具采购发生在特朗普政府致力于永久关闭美国教育部的背景下，自2025年重返白宫以来，特朗普已签署行政命令指示麦克马洪执行这一目标 1。目前，政府已通过裁员将教育部人员近乎减半，并利用“跨机构协议”将特殊教育服务职能转移至卫生与公众服务部，民权执法职能则移交司法部 1。针对外界质疑，教育部发言人萨凡纳·纽豪斯回应称，正如私营部门的情况一样，新的联邦办公室需要具备坐下、书写和开会的基本功能，并重申政府正在实现数百万美元的节约 1。值得注意的是，麦克马洪此前曾声称搬迁举措将为纳税人每年节省480万美元 1。
U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon is set to spend approximately $43,278.64 on new office furniture as part of the department's relocation efforts. 1 The purchase comes despite the Trump administration's ongoing campaign to permanently close the Department of Education and reduce its footprint in Washington, D.C. 1 While critics have raised concerns about the expenditure of public funds, officials justify the cost by citing worn-out existing furnishings that do not match the configuration or aesthetic of the new workspace. 1
The move follows an executive order signed by President Donald Trump after his return to the White House in 2025, which directed McMahon to dismantle the department. 1 As part of this initiative, staff numbers have been nearly halved through layoffs, and specific functions have been transferred to other federal agencies via inter-agency agreements. 1 Special education services are being moved to the Department of Health and Human Services, while civil rights enforcement duties are shifting to the Department of Justice. 1
The Department of Education will relocate from the Lyndon B. Johnson building to a smaller facility in downtown Washington, D.C. 1 McMahon previously claimed that this relocation would save taxpayers $4.8 million annually. 1 Savannah Newhouse, a spokesperson for the department, defended the furniture budget by comparing it to private sector standards, stating that "just like the private sector, new federal offices need places to sit, write, and meet." 1 She further insisted that the government continues to save millions of dollars despite these operational costs. 1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。