英国高等法院近期结束了一起旨在阻止媒体发布匿名知名人士性剥削指控的禁令审判。当事人为保护隐私，在诉讼中被简称为“PPT”，其试图禁止《卫报》和ITN刊发相关报道 1。目前，主审法官Nicklin已退庭并正在等待作出最终裁决 1。
代理被告媒体的律师Gavin Millar KC在庭审中辩称，根据《欧洲人权公约》第10条关于言论自由的规定，《卫报》和ITN负有向公众及消息来源负责的义务，因此应当发布相关信息以维护公共利益 1。这一立场与原告方的诉求形成对立，PPT方面否认所有指控，并援引《欧洲人权公约》第2条（生命权）、第3条（禁止不人道待遇）以及第8条（隐私权），声称出版相关报道将使其面临自杀风险 1。
据披露，该调查涉及超过100人，其中30人提供了第一手证词 1。针对PPT提出的自杀风险担忧，独立专家评估认为，若当事人接受住院精神治疗，虽可降低自杀风险，但无法完全消除该风险 1。
The High Court has heard arguments that the Guardian and ITN have a "duty to the public and sources" to publish sexual exploitation allegations against an anonymous prominent figure known as "PPT." 1 During the injunction hearing, media lawyer Gavin Millar KC argued that under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of expression, the outlets are obligated to release the information. 1 The investigation behind these allegations involved more than 100 people, with 30 individuals providing first-hand testimony. 1
PPT denies all accusations and sought to block the publication by invoking Articles 2, 3, and 8 of the Convention, citing rights to life, protection from inhuman treatment, and privacy. 1 The claimant’s legal team argued that publishing the report would increase the risk of suicide. 1 An independent expert assessed that while inpatient psychiatric treatment could lower this risk, it cannot eliminate it entirely. 1 Judge Nicklin retired to deliberate after concluding the trial, leaving the final decision pending. 1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。