2026年8月18日，围绕湘潭大学撤销唐时达本科学历决定的行政诉讼案件迎来第十次审理 1。这场持续八年的法律战源于弟弟唐一达对哥哥唐时达“冒名顶替”入学的举报，最终导致唐时达的本科学历、硕博学位以及北京户口相继被注销或撤销 1。法院此前虽认定相关决定存在程序瑕疵，但认为实体处理正确；湘潭中院进一步指出，若撤销并责令重作仍会导致相同结果，将浪费行政和司法资源 1。
这一家庭内部矛盾的核心争议在于兄弟二人的身世真相：唐时达自称是双胞胎之一的潘涛，而唐一达则坚称自己是被抱养后改名为唐时达的潘峰 1。据唐一达所述，早在2001年，母亲肖体菊便提出让准备复读的弟弟由哥哥代替入学 1。然而，双方的冲突并未止步于身份之争，房产分割纠纷成为导火索之一。2017年，唐时达起诉要求归还借弟弟名义购买的北京西城区94平方米房屋，获得法院支持 1。同年12月29日，唐一达向湘潭大学及公安机关寄出举报信，指控哥哥冒名顶替 1。
随后的连锁反应迅速波及唐时达的社会身份与生活轨迹。2018年8月23日，湘潭大学认定唐时达学历系被他人冒用，正式撤销其本科学历证书 1。紧接着在2019年5月8日，北京市公安局认定唐时达的北京户口系弄虚作假非法取得，予以注销 1。失去户口后，唐时达随即失业，其硕博学位也被撤销 1。与此同时，关于房产的经济纠纷也画上句号：2024年6月19日，北京二中院终审维持原判，裁定房产由唐时达处理，并由唐时达支付唐一达50万元现金（此前已付160万元），至此唐一达共获得210万元相关权益 1。这场官司不仅彻底破裂了原本的家庭关系，也让当事人失去了原有的社会身份 1。
Tang Shida, a graduate of Xiangtan University, faced the tenth hearing in an administrative lawsuit on August 18, 2026, challenging the revocation of his academic credentials 1. The dispute stems from allegations that he impersonated his younger brother to enroll at the university, leading to the cancellation of his bachelor’s degree, master’s and doctoral degrees, and Beijing household registration 1. The conflict originated from a real estate division dispute between the brothers, which escalated into eight years of litigation involving multiple lawsuits where both parties maintain conflicting narratives regarding their biological origins and factual claims 1.
The legal battle intensified after Tang Yida, the younger brother, mailed a report to Xiangtan University and public security authorities on December 29, 2017, accusing Tang Shida of impersonation 1. Consequently, Xiangtan University determined on August 23, 2018, that Tang Shida’s degree had been used by another person and revoked his bachelor’s certificate 1. This decision resulted in Tang Shida losing his job and subsequent higher education degrees 1. Additionally, the Beijing Public Security Bureau canceled Tang Shida’s household registration on May 8, 2019, citing that it was illegally obtained through fraud 1. The root cause of the familial rift appears to be a property dispute; in 2017, Tang Shida sued his brother to reclaim a 94-square-meter apartment in Beijing’s Xicheng District that had been purchased under his name, with the court ruling in favor of Tang Shida 1.
Central to the ongoing dispute is the brothers’ contradictory account of their identities. Tang Shida asserts he is one of twin siblings named Pan Tao, while Tang Yida claims he was adopted and renamed Tang Shida as Pan Feng 1. According to Tang Yida’s account, their mother, Xiao Tijui, suggested in 2001 that the older brother attend university in place of the younger brother, who was preparing to repeat a grade 1. In June 2024, the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court upheld the original judgment in the final appeal regarding the property dispute, allowing Tang Shida to handle the real estate while requiring him to pay Tang Yida 500,000 yuan in cash, bringing Tang Yida’s total compensation for related rights to 2.1 million yuan, including 1.6 million paid previously 1. Regarding the administrative case, the Xiangtan Intermediate People’s Court has previously noted that if the revocation were overturned and remade only to yield the same result, it would waste judicial and administrative resources 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。