2024年9月3日，深圳市龙岗区国展苑小区内发生一起交通事故，安保人员唐某驾驶无牌三轮车撞倒行人白女士1。交警认定唐某承担事故全部责任，理由包括唐某未取得驾驶证、未佩戴头盔、车辆制动系不符合安全标准1。白女士伤情鉴定为三级伤残1，后于2025年8月15日去世1。
白女士家属以生命权、身体权、健康权纠纷为由，将安保人员所在的物业公司及小区管理处告上法庭，要求其承担人身伤害赔偿责任1。2025年4月14日，深圳市盐田区人民法院一审判决驳回原告全部诉讼请求，理由是唐某的驾车行为不具备职务行为的客观特征与主观要件，不构成职务行为1。家属随后不服一审判决提起上诉1。
案件于2025年10月16日上午在深圳市中级人民法院二审开庭1，法院未当庭宣判1。
A collision involving a security guard in a Shenzhen residential community has reached the appellate stage following disputed liability determinations and a victim's subsequent death. On September 3, 2024, security personnel Tang struck pedestrian Ms. Bai with an unlicensed three-wheeled vehicle on an internal road at Guozhan Yuan residential complex in Longgang District 1. Traffic police determined Tang bore full responsibility for the accident, citing violations including operating the vehicle without a valid driver's license, failing to wear a helmet, and inadequate brake system safety standards 1.
Ms. Bai sustained severe injuries, initially assessed as first-degree disability with cervical spinal cord damage and incomplete paralysis 1. A subsequent forensic medical assessment conducted by Shenzhen Second People's Hospital on November 27, 2025, classified her condition as third-degree disability 1. Ms. Bai died on August 15, 2025 1. The case turned on whether Tang's actions constituted job duties binding the property management company, Shenzhen Guangju Property Management Services Limited and the Guozhan Yuan Management Office, to compensate for personal injuries 1. The Yantian District People's Court accepted the case on April 14, 2025, and rejected all plaintiff claims, ruling that Tang's driving did not possess the objective and subjective characteristics of job-related conduct 1. Dissatisfied with the first-instance decision, the family appealed 1. The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court held a hearing on October 16, 2025, but did not issue a verdict that day 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。