当下艺术家正面临一个独特的悖论：如何在生成式AI泛滥的时代，通过有意义的艺术创作来推动对这项技术的批判性思考。1媒体理论家乔安娜·齐林斯卡将当代AI艺术分为两类，其中流行AI艺术将技术单纯作为视觉奇观的工具来庆祝AI将数据转化为图像的能力，而批判性AI艺术则试图让技术所带来的伦理问题可见化。1
艺术家们正在探索后者的可能性。艺术家艾扬·金创作的作品《Delivery Dancer's Arc: Inverse（2024）》综合运用生成式AI、CGI、视频游戏引擎和真人素材进行创作，展现了如何将AI作为一种反思性的创意媒介。1然而，理论家维克多·伯金对批判性AI艺术在画廊中的作用提出了疑虑，认为其不能仅依赖视觉呈现，还需要背景叙事来传达意图。1作者本人也通过探索性作品进行了实验，尝试使用AI生成其母亲孕期前的图像，由此揭示了生成式AI系统在视觉语言和图像标签方面存在的问题。1这些实践表明，有意义的艺术实验或许能够帮助我们理解AI系统的局限，而不是被动地接受AI生成内容的泛滥。
As generative AI continues to flood digital spaces with low-quality content, artists and creatives face an emerging paradox: can they harness the same technology as a meaningful artistic medium to critique and expose AI's limitations? 1
Media theorist Joanna Zylinska distinguishes between two approaches to generative AI art. 1 Popular AI art celebrates the technology's capacity to transform data into visual spectacle, while critical AI art renders the ethical implications of these systems visible through the work itself. 1 Artist Ayoung Kim exemplifies this critical approach in the 2024 work "Delivery Dancer's Arc: Inverse," which layers generative AI, CGI, video game engines, and real human footage into a complex artistic statement. 1 However, theorist Victor Burgin raises skepticism about art galleries' role in critiquing AI, arguing that critical AI art requires contextual explanation rather than relying on visual presentation alone to convey its message. 1
The author has experimented with creating AI-generated images exploring visual language and labeling systems within AI models, attempting to generate images of their mother before her birth—a conceptual exercise that probes how AI systems understand and represent the visual world. 1 Such intentional artistic experimentation suggests that meaningful engagement with generative AI may help audiences understand the technology's constraints and assumptions, offering an alternative to passive consumption of AI-generated content proliferating online. 1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。