津巴布韦作家辛巴拉舍·昆迪泽扎否认使用人工智能生成文本创作其获得凯恩文学奖的短篇小说《蓝色斗士》1。该作品于10月6日被宣布为获奖作品，但五天后美国《大西洋月刊》记者瓦乌希尼·瓦拉发表文章质疑其真实性1。瓦拉声称通过AI检测软件Pangram进行检测，该故事几乎完全由AI生成1。
昆迪泽扎在X平台上发表声明明确表态："为了避免任何疑问，我写了《蓝色斗士》。我没有使用生成式AI来创作它。这完全是我自己的作品。"1瓦拉对该作品的评价颇为苛刻，称"品味是主观的，但相信我，这个故事很糟糕——感伤而充满陈旧的俗套。"1
凯恩奖委员会表示将对相关指控进行调查，同时对AI检测软件的可靠性提出质疑1。凯恩奖主席埃拉·瓦卡塔玛指出："作为一个奖项的主席，显然我不反对AI，但我反对的是它在这个案件中被用作最终仲裁者。"1
此案反映了文学奖领域对AI生成内容日益增长的关注。特立尼达作家贾米尔·纳齐尔因《林中蛇》获英联邦基金会短篇小说奖，加拿大-海地作家特莱松·奥雷利昂的《C'était Ça Ou Mourir》则被从龚古尔奖长名单中移除1。
Zimbabwean author Simbarashe Kundizeza has rejected allegations that he used artificial intelligence to compose his short story "The Blue Fighter," which won the Caine Prize for Literature on October 61. The controversy emerged five days later when Vauhini Vara, a journalist from The Atlantic, published an article questioning the work's authenticity, claiming that AI detection software called Pangram indicated the story was generated almost entirely by artificial intelligence1.
In response, Kundizeza stated on X: "For the avoidance of doubt, I wrote 'The Blue Fighter'. I did not use generative AI to write it. It is entirely my own work."1
Vara critiqued the story's quality in her article, writing: "Taste is subjective, but trust me, this story is bad – maudlin and full of tired tropes."1 The Caine Prize committee announced it would investigate the allegations while expressing skepticism about the reliability of AI detection tools1. Ella Wakatamai, chair of the prize, stated: "As someone who chairs a prize, I'm obviously not against AI, but what I am against is it being used as a final arbiter in this case."1
The controversy reflects broader concerns about AI in literary competitions, following similar incidents including Trinidad-born author Jamil Nazir's Commonwealth Foundation short story prize win for "Snake in the Grass" in July and Canadian-Haitian writer Tréson Orélien's removal from the Goncourt Prize longlist for "C'était Ça Ou Mourir."1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。