开发者利用Claude等AI模型创建Adobe Photoshop及其他专业软件的克隆版本的现象日益普遍1。据统计，约有12个AI项目试图克隆Photoshop，加上数十个分支版本，其中规模最大的克隆项目拥有165名开发者1。
这些克隆项目投入成本巨大，单个项目在两周内的API成本就超过$50,0001。然而，这些仿制品在实际应用中存在多方面缺陷。性能方面，克隆版本的刷子引擎在8K×8K像素以上的画布性能崩溃，远低于Photoshop可处理1亿像素图像的能力1。功能层面，克隆版本还存在复制粘贴缓慢、撤销堆栈冻结、文件格式兼容性差等问题1。相比之下，用户可以选择免费的Affinity Photo，或年费$200的Photoshop，这些替代方案在成本和实际可用性上都更具竞争力1。
Developers have launched approximately 12 AI-powered projects aimed at cloning Adobe Photoshop, along with dozens of derivative versions, according to reports discussing the phenomenon of "vibe coding"—using artificial intelligence models like Claude to recreate professional software.1 The largest of these clone projects has assembled a team of 165 developers and relies on Claude for development.1 These ambitious undertakings carry substantial costs, with a single project consuming more than $50,000 in API expenses over just two weeks.1
Despite their scale and investment, these clones struggle to match commercial software in performance, compatibility, and feature completeness.1 The brush engines in clone versions crash when handling canvases larger than 8K x 8K pixels, while Photoshop can process images up to 100 million pixels.1 Users of the clones encounter additional problems including slow copy-paste operations, frozen undo stacks, and poor file format compatibility.1 The economic case for these projects is questionable: developers must spend a minimum of $2,000 on AI-generated development costs, compared to Affinity Photo's free offering and Photoshop's annual subscription fee of $200.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。