美国最高法院周四同意受理一起案件，挑战特朗普政府对非法入境移民的无限期拘留政策1。该政策将之前允许有固定社群联系移民获得保释的做法改为对所有非法入境移民强制拘留1。
案件申请人为巴西籍公民里卡多·阿帕雷西多·巴博萨·达·库尼亚1。他在美国已生活超过20年，于2005年左右非法入境1，拥有马萨诸塞州的住房、经营小型建筑公司，已婚且有两个美国出生的子女，从未被控犯罪1。去年他被美国移民与海关执法局拘捕，被转移到纽约州布法罗的移民拘留设施1。由于新的无限期拘留政策，他被拒绝保释听证1。
地方法院支持库尼亚，责令政府向其提供保释听证，上诉法院也维持了该决定1。据《纽约时报》报道，500多名地方法院法官和11个联邦上诉法院中的9个在审理类似案件后都拒绝了特朗普政府的这一新解释1。
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case challenging the Trump administration's policy of indefinite detention for undocumented immigrants awaiting deportation proceedings 1. The policy, reinterpreted by the Trump administration last year, expands mandatory detention to all undocumented entrants, replacing the previous practice that allowed those with established community ties to seek bail 1.
The case centers on Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa da Cunha, a Brazilian citizen who has lived in the United States for over 20 years 1. He entered the country illegally around 2005 and has since established substantial roots: he owns property in Massachusetts, operates a small construction business, is married, and has two U.S.-born children 1. Despite this history and having no criminal convictions, he was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement last year and transferred to an immigration detention facility in Buffalo, New York 1.
Lower courts sided with Barbosa da Cunha, with a district court ordering the government to provide him a bail hearing, and an appellate court upholding that decision 1. According to reporting cited in the case materials, over 500 district court judges and nine of eleven federal appeals courts have rejected the Trump administration's new interpretation when hearing similar cases 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。