美国最高法院大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊在哥伦比亚特区大学David A Clarke法学院发表讲话，批评最高法院对紧急清单的处理方式。1杰克逊表示，"最高法院现代的紧急止审做法存在严重问题，可能产生破坏性和腐蚀性影响"，1并指出这一做法削弱了公众对司法制度的信心。1她警告，"如果不谨慎，紧急清单可能成为绕过标准审查程序的捷径"。1
自2025年1月特朗普政府回任以来，已向最高法院提交30多份紧急请求，其中大多数获得保守派法官批准。1通过这些紧急请求，保守派大法官允许特朗普政府暂停移民庇护保护、消除跨性别权利、回退环保措施等政策。1杰克逊承认法院近来提供了更多解释，但表示这"仍不足以满足"正常案件的标准。1
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has criticized the court's use of its emergency docket, warning that the practice poses a serious threat to public confidence in the judicial system.1 Speaking at David A. Clarke Law School at the University of the District of Columbia, Jackson stated that "there is a serious concern that the supreme court's modern stay practices are having a disruptive and potentially corrosive effect."1 She cautioned that without careful oversight, "the emergency docket can and will become an end-run around the standard review process."1
Jackson's remarks come as the Trump administration, which returned to office in January 2025, has submitted more than 30 emergency requests to the court, with the conservative-majority bench approving most of them.1 Through these expedited procedures, conservative justices have allowed the administration to suspend immigration asylum protections, eliminate transgender rights protections, and roll back environmental safeguards.1 While Justice Elena Kagan told Congress in July that she believed the court was improving how it handles emergency requests, Jackson indicated that recent improvements remain insufficient.1 She acknowledged that the court "began to explain more" but stated this amounts to "still not the full kind of explanation" required by normal case review standards.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。