新泽西州法院于2025年8月26日对数据经纪公司Radaris下达默认判决，命令将包括radaris.com在内的14个域名转移给原告Atlas Data Privacy Corp1。这一判决源于Radaris违反新泽西州《丹尼尔法案》，该法案要求数据经纪商从数据库中删除执法人员及其家属的个人信息1。
Radaris在多年诉讼过程中采取了多种规避策略，包括虚假所有权声明、使用壳公司以及进行国际管辖权变更1。Atlas Data Privacy Corp于2024年2月首次起诉Radaris，并在2025年6月扩大诉讼范围，指控多个Radaris关联数据经纪公司违法1。最终因反复缺席诉讼，Radaris败诉1。根据《丹尼尔法案》规定，对违反删除请求的数据经纪商罚款标准为每次违规1,000美元1。数据显示，Radaris月收入约42,000美元，其关联公司Veripages月收入约45,000美元1。
该判决反映了监管机构对数据经纪行业的加强监督。至少14个州已通过类似新泽西州《丹尼尔法案》的隐私法1。与此同时，超过150家数据经纪商已向联邦法院提出宪法挑战，质疑该法案违反第一修正案1。西弗吉尼亚州《丹尼尔法案》已被联邦地区法院认定在2025年8月违反第一修正案1。
A New Jersey court issued a default judgment against data broker Radaris on August 26, 2025, ordering the transfer of 14 domains—including radaris.com—to plaintiff Atlas Data Privacy Corp. 1 The ruling stemmed from litigation initiated by Atlas in February 2024 over violations of New Jersey's Daniel Act, legislation that requires data brokers to delete personal information belonging to law enforcement officers and their family members from their databases. 1
Radaris had evaded accountability for years through various tactics, including false ownership claims, shell companies, and jurisdictional maneuvers, but ultimately lost the case due to repeated failure to appear in court. 1 Atlas expanded its legal challenge in June 2025 to include multiple data broker companies affiliated with Radaris, alleging widespread violations of the statute. 1 Under the Daniel Act, violations carry penalties of $1,000 per occurrence for failing to comply with deletion requests. 1 According to available financial data, Radaris generated approximately $42,000 in monthly revenue, while its affiliated company Veripages earned roughly $45,000 monthly. 1
The Radaris case reflects growing tensions over data broker regulation. More than 150 data brokers have mounted constitutional challenges in federal court, arguing that the Daniel Act violates First Amendment protections. 1 At least 14 states have enacted similar privacy legislation modeled on New Jersey's law, and a federal district court ruled in August 2025 that West Virginia's comparable statute violated the First Amendment. 1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。