巴西最高法院两名法官在总统大选第二轮投票前夕发生严重冲突1。法官亚历山德雷·德莫雷斯与安德烈·门东萨在电视直播的听证会上互相指责，德莫雷斯直言门东萨"为企图在这个国家发动政变的政治集团效力"，门东萨则否认指控1。这场冲突涉及班科·马斯特银行丑闻的调查处理方式，该案件去年11月被曝光1。
冲突的核心在于调查程序的公正性问题1。门东萨被指控对德莫雷斯的调查采取了加快措施，同时拖延了对右翼政治人物的调查1。德莫雷斯妻子的律师事务所与班科·马斯特之间存在2500万美元的合同，而该银行所有者丹尼尔·沃卡罗被指与前总统弗拉维奥·博尔索纳罗有关联1。背景上，德莫雷斯在近十年前被任命，而门东萨在博尔索纳罗2018年至2023年的任期内被任命，他是巴西最高法院11个席位中唯一公开宣称的福音派成员1。总统大选第二轮投票定于10月25日举行1。
Two justices of Brazil's Supreme Court engaged in a dramatic clash during a televised hearing on Tuesday, as tensions over judicial impartiality threatened to deepen the nation's political turmoil on the eve of the October 25 presidential runoff election.1 Justice Alexandre de Moraes accused Justice André Mendonça of selective prosecution, declaring: "You're at the service of a political group that tried to launch a coup in this country!"1 Mendonça denied the allegation, responding: "It's a lie!"1
The confrontation centers on the investigation into Banco Master, a scandal that surfaced in November of the previous year.1 De Moraes contends that Mendonça has expedited inquiries targeting him while deliberately slowing investigations into right-wing political figures, including those linked to Flavio Bolsonaro—whose association with bank owner Daniel Vocararo has drawn scrutiny.1 The controversy has been further inflamed by revelations that a law firm operated by de Moraes' wife secured a 25 million dollar contract with Banco Master, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.1
The judicial rift reflects deeper ideological divisions within the court itself.1 Mendonça, appointed during Bolsonaro's 2018-2023 presidency, stands as the sole openly evangelical member among the court's eleven justices, while de Moraes was appointed approximately a decade earlier.1 The public dispute between these two justices underscores mounting concerns about institutional independence and the weaponization of Brazil's judiciary amid an intensely polarized electoral environment.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。