美国最高法院驳回了特朗普限制邮寄投票的计划1。特朗普政府在2024年3月签署行政令，指示美国邮政总局对邮寄选票实施条码追踪和在线门户登记要求1。该行政令遭到23个州和华盛顿特区的诉讼挑战1。
最高法院确认了联邦法官塔尔瓦尼在9月4日作出的临时禁令1。法院认定这些新规定在11月中期选举前实施可能导致选民被剥夺投票权1。仅有托马斯和阿利托两位大法官支持特朗普的立场5。大法官卡瓦诺表示，将这些规则适用于2026年选举将是"专断和武断的"1。据数据显示，约30%的选民（多数为民主党人）在两年前的大选中投了邮寄选票1。民主党议员对最高法院的裁决表示支持，认为这将确保选举的安全、安保和准确7。
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's attempt to limit mail-in voting ahead of the midterm elections.1 The court upheld a federal judge's temporary injunction against new rules that would have required mail-in ballots to include barcode tracking and online registration requirements.1
In March 2024, Trump signed an executive order directing the U.S. Postal Service to implement these tracking and registration measures for mail-in ballots.1 The order faced legal challenges from 23 states and Washington, D.C.1 The Supreme Court determined that implementing these restrictions before the November midterm elections could deprive voters of their right to vote.1 Only Justices Thomas and Alito supported Trump's position on the matter.5 Justice Kavanaugh indicated that applying such rules in the 2026 elections would be "arbitrary and capricious," though he did not block the current decision.1
The rejection marks the second setback for Trump's mail-voting restrictions at the Supreme Court level.5 Democratic lawmakers praised the decision, stating it would ensure "safe, secure and accurate elections."7
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。