在Hacker News上的一场讨论中，用户分享了他们选择Claude作为默认AI模型的原因。1该用户表示，Claude的Opus 4.8版本相比其他模型（如Fable）在成本效益上更具竞争力。1
用户指出，Fable模型的成本过高是放弃该选项的主要原因。1据其描述，该模型仅需几分钟就会耗尽Max计划的session credits，而缓存超时问题更为严重——不到一分钟内就消耗了2%的session额度。1相比之下，Claude Opus 4.8能够以更经济的方式满足需求。1该用户主要从事网页和移动应用开发工作，Claude成为了他完成这些任务的理想工具。1
A discussion thread on Hacker News has emerged where users are sharing their choices for default AI models and the reasoning behind their selections.1 One user has highlighted Claude as their primary tool, citing cost-effectiveness as a key factor in their decision.1
The user noted that alternative models present significant drawbacks in terms of resource consumption.1 Specifically, they reported that the Fable model consumed credits at an unsustainable rate, depleting their Max plan's session credits within minutes.1 Cache timeout issues compounded the problem, with a single incident consuming 2% of their session quota in less than a minute.1 In contrast, the user identified Claude's Opus 4.8 version as their current preferred option, which they use for web and mobile application development work.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。