中美会议周二向NCAA和大学橄榄球联赛提出上诉，质疑密歇根大学与西密歇根大学橄榄球比赛的最终结果1。密歇根通过补时阶段的达阵传球以13-12险胜，但中美会议主张回放协议执行出现错误，西密歇根才应是实际赢家1。
中美会议专员Jon Steinbrecher指出，争议的关键在于回放官员在时钟上加回的一秒钟不应该存在1。他表示："这不是关于在时钟上放置适当时间的判断。这是在应用既定重放协议的执行中的错误"1。根据中美会议的上诉，若按照正确的重放协议执行，西密歇根应以12-7获胜1。此前密歇根在美联社前25排名中位列第16，周二后跌出排名1。
The Mid-American Conference filed an appeal on Tuesday challenging the outcome of the football game between the University of Michigan and Western Michigan University, seeking recognition from the NCAA and College Football Playoff committee that Western Michigan was the rightful victor.1 Michigan won the contested matchup 13-12 following a touchdown pass in overtime, but the conference contends that replay officials incorrectly applied established protocol by adding one second back to the game clock, a decision that should not have been made.1 According to the conference's position, Western Michigan should have been credited with a 12-7 victory instead.1
Mid-American Conference Commissioner Jon Steinbrecher characterized the dispute as a matter of procedural error rather than judgment, stating: "This is not about a judgment call on placing the appropriate time on the clock. This is an error in the execution of applying an established replay protocol."1 The outcome carries significant implications for Michigan's standing, as the team ranked 16th in the Associated Press preseason top 25 poll but dropped out of the rankings following the Tuesday decision.1
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。